Yip-Chiu-Cheung v R

312 words (1 pages) Case Summary in Cases

07/03/18 Cases Reference this

Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Parallelewelten.net.

If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.

Yip-Chiu-Cheung v The Queen (1994) 2 All E.R. 924

Conspiracy – Criminal Attempts – Drug Trafficking – Mens Rea

Facts

The defendant entered into an agreement with an undercover narcotics officer in a hotel in Hong Kong.  The agreement was that the defendant was to give the officer 5kg of heroin to be smuggled into Australia.  In return, the officer was to receive US$16,000.  The police officer never flew into Australia and in fact never met the defendant because of a cancelled flight.  The defendant was arrested and charged with conspiracy to traffic drugs contrary to Hong Kong’s penal code.  He was convicted and appealed on the ground that in law there was in fact no conspiracy because the police officer never had the requisite mens rea of intent to traffic the drugs as the officer had been in at all times with the authorities in both Hong Kong and in Australia.

Issue

Did the defendant commit the crime of conspiracy?  Whether the undercover police officer had the requisite mens rea to commit the offence of trafficking?  Whether both parties to a ‘conspiracy’ require real intent to carry out the crime?

Held

The defendant’s appeal was dismissed.  Because the undercover agent had not intended to prevent the heroin being smuggled, but had intended to arrest the defendant and others after the smuggling had occurred, a conspiracy existed.  Both parties were guilty, notwithstanding that the authorities were aware of what was occurring and that they did not intend to stop it.  The undercover agent of course would not be prosecuted for the offense. The fact that the authorities did not intervene or prevent the offense occurring did not prevent it being a conspiracy.

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.

Current Offers