Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.
If you would like to view other samples of the academic work produced by our writers, please click here.
Wong v Parkside Health NHS Trust  EWCA Civ 1721
Assault – Damage – Harassment – Intention – Psychiatric harm
Minna Wong (W) was employed as a wheelchair administrator by NHS Trust. In this employment, she suffered harassment from her colleagues which resulted in physical and psychiatric harm to W. In 1995 W was successful in prosecuting M, one of the employees, for assault. In 1998 W raised an action against the trust for negligence on the basis of its vicariously liability for the torts of its employees, and against M for intentionally causing harm to W due to M’s harassment. The claim against M was unsuccessful, and W appealed.
The issues in question were (1) the scope of the tort of intentionally causing harm under the principle in Wilkinson v Downton  2 QB 57 that the behaviour was likely to result in harm that and could impute an intention of harm; and (2) whether there was a tort of harassment at common law before the enactment of the Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (1997 Act).
Under the double jeopardy rule, M’s assault against W was excluded from consideration under section 45 of the Offences Against the Person Act 1861. As a result, all that could be considered were W's allegations that M had been rude and unfriendly, yet the tort of intentionally inflicting harm required proof of actual physical harm or psychiatric illness. Therefore, in line with Wilkinson v Downton, an intention to cause harm could not be imputed in the present case. Nor could W succeed on the second issue, as there was no tort of intentional harassment at common law before the 1997 Act. The appeal was dismissed.
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.