Our offices are open as usual over the Easter break

Wiseman v Simpson

328 words (1 pages) Case Summary in Cases

12/10/18 Cases Reference this

Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.

If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.

Wiseman v Simpson [1988] 1 WLR 35

Exclusion of a spouse from the premises of property of which he/she is a joint tenant.


A young unmarried, co-habiting couple were joint-tenants of a council flat. One year later, the relationship became unhappy and the women changed the locks and refused her partner re-entry of the flat. Living with his parents, the man applied to the Court under Section 1 of the Domestic Violence and Matrimonial Proceedings Act 1976 for an order to allow him to return.


The question arose as to whether the women could lawfully exclude a joint tenant of the property from the premises in the context of their ‘spousal’ relationship.


The Court held that Section 1 of the Domestic Violence Act 1976 must be read in lieu of Section 1(3) of the Matrimonial Homes Act 1983 which requires any order of exclusion of a spouse to be “just and reasonable” in consideration of all circumstances. The first instance court had ruled the man’s exclusion reasonable as he had alternative occupation and the couple ceased to be ‘in love.’ However, the Court of Appeal considered his exclusion to be “drastic” and reasoning to be “draconian” (p 43), emphasising the parties’ rights as joint tenants. The Court stipulated the principle that joint tenants of property simultaneously have “the right to occupy and neither can lawfully exclude the other.” (p 42). Thus, unless a joint tenant has legally infringed upon the rights of another, even if a joint tenant in property finds it intolerable to remain on the premises with another joint tenant, he/she would have no legal right nor remedy to exclude the other from occupation or possession of the property. Thus, the Court disapproved of the exclusion of the man from his flat and directed a new trial.

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.

Ready to get started?