Warner Bros v Nelson – Case Brief

302 words (1 pages) Case Summary in Cases

07/03/18 Cases Reference this

Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Parallelewelten.net.

If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.

Warner Brothers Pictures Inc. v Nelson [1937] 1 KB 209

Contract law – Breach of contract – Damages

Facts

The defendant was a film artist, otherwise known as Bette Davis, who had entered into a contract with the plaintiffs, Warner Bros. Pictures, in the United States to provide her services exclusively to the company for the period of twelve months with a further twelve-month option. Under the contract, she could not, therefore, provide her services to another company, without the plaintiff’s express written consent. By her own admission, the defendant came to the United Kingdom to agree with a business to work to produce films for a third party and claimed that she was no longer bound by the original agreement with the defendants. The plaintiffs brought an action and claimed an injunction to restrain her actions.

Issue

The issue for the court was to understand and consider all of the options available with regards to remedying the breach of contract in this instance. Specific performance would be a strict requirement that would require Nelson to perform for the business, whereas damages would potentially be difficult to quantify in the circumstances. The court would also have to consider the length of time that such a restriction might run for.

Held

The court found that the contract was not meant to force the defendant to specific performance but that an injunction would enforce the contract to perform and therefore specific performance was not an appropriate remedy. This was also the case for damages as they could not be appropriate quantified under the circumstances. On this basis, an injunction, with a time limit was applied to prevent Nelson from carrying out the other contract.

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.

https://buysteroids.in.ua

farm-pump-ua.com

Current Offers