Our phone lines are closed Monday 27th May. You can still place your order online as usual.

Thomas v Thomas – 1842

296 words (1 pages) Case Summary in Cases

07/03/18 Cases Reference this

Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Parallelewelten.net.

If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.

Thomas v Thomas (1842) 2 QB 851; 114 ER 330

Consideration need only be legally not economically adequate.


Before he died, Mr Thomas said he wished for his wife to have the house they lived in for the rest of her life.  However, this was not written into his will. After he died, his executors, ‘in consideration of such promise’, agreed with Mrs Thomas that she would pay a peppercorn rent of £1 per year in return for being allowed to live in the house.  They later tied to dispossess her.


A valid contract must be supported by consideration. That is, the promisee must promise to do something in return for the promise of the other party. It was argued that there was no contract because Mrs Thomas, the promise, provided inadequate consideration as the rent was nothing like a commercial rent for the property. Mrs Thomas argued that her promise to pay rent and keep the house in repair was good consideration.


The executors statement did not create a contract as it only expressed their motive for entering into the agreement. However, the £1 rent was recognized as good consideration. Patteson J said (at 859):

Motive is not the same thing as consideration. Consideration means something which is of some value in the eye of the law, moving from the plaintiff:

Without consideration the transaction was merely a voluntary gift. However, by agreeing to pay rent in return for being allowed to stay in the property, Mrs Thomas had provided consideration, even though it was not economically adequate or anything like a commercial rent for the building. Therefore, the contract was enforceable. 

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.


Current Offers