Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Parallelewelten.net.
If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.
Thomas v National Union of Mineworkers  Ch 20
Assault, capacity to carry out threats immediately, harassment
During a set of strikes organised by the National Union of Miners (NUM – the Defendant), the Claimant, who was a miner, wanted to continue working in the mines instead of going on strike. He, along with other miners who also wanted to continue working, had to be bussed to the mines so that they could get to work through the pickets. Every day this involved being driven through an aggressive crowd of striking miners (organised by the Defendant) who shouted threats towards the Claimant and others who were on the bus, in addition to making violent gestures in their direction. However, there was always police at the scene who stood between the pickets and the bus and in addition, the Claimant and the other miners were protected by the bus itself.
The issue in the case was whether it was necessary for the Defendant to be able to carry out his threats immediately for him to be guilty of an assault.
The court held that the actions of the Defendant could not constitute an assault as the crowd lacked the capacity to immediately carry out its threats. Capability to put a threat imminently was a necessary aspect of the tort of assault. However, the actions of the Defendant were actionable under the tort of nuisance, since they interfered with the Claimant’s right to use the highway and to attend work without harassment.
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.