Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Parallelewelten.net.
If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.
Standard Chartered Bank Ltd v Walker  3 All ER 938
MORTGAGEES – SALE OF LAND – SALE BY MORTGAGEE – DUTY TO GUARANTOR – EXTENT OF LIABILITY
A company issued to P, a bank, a debenture giving P a charge over the company's assets in respect of any sums then or in future owing to P. The debenture empowered P to appoint a receiver with a provision that any receiver so appointed was to be deemed the company's agent and that the company alone would be responsible for his acts or defaults. In November 1980 P appointed a receiver who engaged auctioneers to hold a sale of the company's stock. As the auction was held on a cold day in February the proceeds of sale was entirely absorbed by the expenses of realisation and preferential debts other than that of P. P claimed the sums guaranteed by D and D subsequently brought an action against P, alleging the sale was poorly organised and realised at a gross undervalue.
Whether a receiver realising assets under a debenture owed a duty to both the borrower and the guarantor of the debt to exercise reasonable care and judgement to obtain the best price available for those assets; Whether the holder of a debenture could be liable for the actions of a receiver if the process of receivership was interfered with.
A receiver realising assets under a debenture owed a duty both to the borrower and to a guarantor of the debt to take reasonable care to obtain the best price that circumstances permitted, and that a duty was also owed to exercise reasonable care in choosing the time for the sale. Despite the receiver being deemed the company's agent, P, as holder of the debenture, might have responsibility for the receiver's actions if it were shown that it interfered with the conduct of the receivership. As these were triable issues D would be granted unconditional leave to defend.
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.