Our offices are open as usual over the Easter break

Robinson v Kilvert – 1889

312 words (1 pages) Case Summary in Cases

07/03/18 Cases Reference this

Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.

If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.

Robinson v Kilvert [1889] 41 Ch D 88

Nuisance – Sensitivity of the Claimant

Facts

The defendants operated a factory which made paper boxes.  This required the factory to be continually warm and dry to ensure that the paper boxes were in good condition.  The claimant rented the ground floor and used this area to store special brown paper.  The heat from the defendant’s factory damaged this brown paper, which was unusually sensitive to heat, and the claimant sued in nuisance.

Issues

Whether it was a defence to say that the claimants brown paper was unusually sensitive to heat.  Whether or not there was a nuisance because of the damage to the brown paper, when ordinary paper would not have been damaged by the conditions.  Whether the fact that the defendant’s acts would not have harmed anything other than special brown paper was relevant.

Held

The claim was dismissed as there was no nuisance.  The conditions in the factory were not particularly unusual, and the claimant’s operation of the factory in these conditions was not unlawful.  The defendants had acted as reasonable tenants of their property.  It had been shown that the heat from the factory would not have damaged ordinary paper.  Instead the defendant’s brown paper happened to be unusually sensitive to the heat, and it was this which caused the damage rather than anything that the defendants had done wrong.  Accordingly, this could not be considered a nuisance caused by the defendants.  Where one carries on an unusually delicate trade, they cannot then complain because they are injured by the defendant’s carrying on their lawful business on their property if this would not have injured anything but an unusually delicate trade.             

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.

https://pillsbank.net

https://pillsbank.net

https://pillsbank.net

Ready to get started?