Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.
If you would like to view other samples of the academic work produced by our writers, please click here.
R v Smith  QB 354
Damage to property – mistake – Criminal Damage Act 1971
Smith was the tenant of a ground floor flat. With the landlord’s permission, he installed some sound equipment and soundproofing material. When he was given notice to exit the flat, the defendant ripped out the soundproofing to access the wires lying underneath it. As a matter of law, the soundproofing had become a fixture of the property and belonged to the landlord. Smith was charged with causing criminal damage to certain property. Smith’s defence was that he had an honest belief the property was his. This was not accepted by the trial judge and Smith appealed the decision.
It was important to consider the offence under the Criminal Damage Act 1971:
‘No offence is committed under Criminal Damage Act 1971, section 1(1) where a person damages property belonging to another if he does so in the honest though mistaken belief that the property is his own.’
The court was also concerned as to whether the belief that Smith had with regards to the property was reasonable or not.
Appeal allowed. An honest but mistaken belief could be used as a lawful defence to such a charge under the circumstances. It was held that the trial judge had erred in not letting Smith demonstrate his case to the jury and this was considered to be a fundamental misdirection in the law. It was irrelevant to consider whether such a belief was justifiable or not as if the individual believed the property was his own, he lacked mens rea at the time of the act. The conviction was quashed as a result.
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.