Parallelewelten logo
Parallelewelten The law essay professionals
0115 966 7966 Times 10:00 - 22:00 (GMT)

R v Adomako [1995] 1 A.C. 171

Facts

The defendant, Mr Adomako, was an anaesthetist. He was undertaking his role during an eye operation during which the patient was required to be placed under a general anaesthetic. During the operation, and whilst under Mr. Adomako’s supervision, a crucial tube became disconnected from the ventilator and the patient suffered a fatal cardiac arrest. Mr Adomako was convicted of the manslaughter by breach of duty.

Issue

Mr Adomako appealed the conviction and questioned the legal basis of involuntary manslaughter by breach of duty.

Held

Dismissing Mr Adomako’s appeal, it was held that in cases of manslaughter by criminal negligence involving a breach of duty the ordinary principles of the law of negligence applied to ascertain whether the defendant had been in breach of a duty of care to the victim. On the establishment of said breach of duty the next question was that of establishing causation and, and if this could be so established, whether it should be characterised as gross negligence and therefore a crime. This is ultimately a question for the jury, having regard to the risk of death involved, asking themselves ‘was the defendant’s conduct so bad in all the circumstances that it ought to amount to criminal?’


To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below:

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
https://buysteroids.in.ua

www.buysteroids.in.ua/kupit-zhiroszhigateli/clenbuterol.html

У нашей компании нужный сайт про направление Битумная черепица Katepal Classik KL eurobud.com.ua