Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.
If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.
R (on the application of Beresford) v Sunderland CC  UKHL 60
Property Law – Commons – Town or village green – Registration
A new town development created a town plan that identified an open space in the town as a playing field/parkland. For over 20 years, the open space was used for recreational use, was mowed and kept in useable condition. Access was provided to the public. The land was sold to the council and the practice continued. Beresford applied for registration of the land on the ground that it had been used “as of right” under s 22(1) of the Commons Registration Act 1965 (the Act). The council claimed it was a use of right by an implied licence.
Whether a claim to use the land “as of right” within the meaning of s 22(1) of the Act was defeated by an implied licence.
Appeal allowed. The activity of the authority over the last 20 years and more did in no way indicate that the use of the land was revocable at any time due to a licence. The act of mowing the grass and maintaining the area for general public use encouraged the area to be used for recreational purposes, and continued without any break of such use for more than 20 years. No other evidence could reasonably infer that the land was available to be used, the use had been “as of right” within the meaning of s 22(1) of the Act. Thus, the refusing of the application for the land to be registered as a town green would be quashed.
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.