Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.
Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.
If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.
Paradine v Jane  EWHC KB J5
CONTRACT, IMPOSSIBILITY TO ENJOY LAND, LANDLORD AND LESSEE, DUTY CREATED BY OWN CONTRACT, LIABILITY, ACCIDENT, HOUSE DESTROYED
The plaintiff, Paradine, brought an action against the defendant, Jane, for the rent arrears for the lands that Paradine had leased to Jane. The defendant acknowledge that he owed the money for the rent. However, the reason why he did not pay it was because the land was invaded by the enemy of the King, his cattle was driven away and he was expelled from the land, so effectively, he could not enjoy it.
Should a lessee who was expelled from his land be liable for rent for a period in which he has been expelled from the land.
(1) Where a party creates a duty or charge upon himself by virtue of a contract, he is bound to perform the duty or pay the charge, notwithstanding any accident. The reason why this is so, is because the party could have inserted a clause in the contract, which prescribes what is to be done with the rent in case of an accident.
(2) In the absence of an express covenant, the lessee is equally liable as the rent is an obligation created upon the reservation.
(3) The lessee in the present case is bound to pay rent, despite the fact that the house may have been burnt by lightning, thrown down by enemies and although he may have been expelled from the land or the land may have been inundated.
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.