This essay was produced by our professional law writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies
Published: Wed, 07 Mar 2018
Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd v Morts Dock & Engineering Co (The Wagon Mound)  AC 388
Tort law – Remoteness Rule – Causation – Negligence – Reasonably Foreseeable – Foreseeability – Contributory Negligence – Duty of Care
The crew members of the Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd were working on a ship, when they failed to turn off one of the furnace taps. This caused oil to leak from the ship into the Sydney Harbour. Morts Dock & Engineering Co (The Wagon Mound) owned the wharf, which they used to perform repairs on other ships. The leaking oil on the water surface drifted to the site where Morts were welding metal. A supervisor enquired to find out whether the oil was flammable, which he was assured that it was not. However, a spark from welding and mixed with debris, caught fire from the spilt oil and this caused a fire to spread rapidly. This caused significant damage to Mort’s wharf.
The issue in this case was whether the crew could be liable for the damage to the wharf that was caused by the fire. In addition, would this also be the case even if it was unforeseeable, but a result of a negligent act.
The court held that Overseas Tankship (UK) Ltd could not be held liable to pay compensation for the damage to the wharf. This case disapproved the direct consequence test in Re Polemisand established the test of remoteness of damage. This asks whether the damage would be reasonably foreseeable. In this case, the damage caused to the wharf by the fire and the furnace oil being set alight could not be foreseen by a reasonable person.
Cite This Essay
To export a reference to this article please select a referencing style below: