Miller | Criminal Law Case | Parallelewelten

148 words (1 pages) Case Summary in Cases

07/03/18 Cases Reference this

Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of UK Essays.

If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.

Miller Case

HOUSE OF LORDS 

LORD DIPLOCK, LORD KEITH OF KINKEL, LORD BRIDGE OF HARWICH, LORD BRANDON

OF OAKBROOK AND LORD BRIGHTMAN 

16 FEBRUARY, 17 MARCH 1983

The actus reus of the offence of arson, contrary to s 1(1) and (3)a of the Criminal Damage Act 1971, is present if the defendant

accidentally starts a fire and thereafter, intending to destroy or

damage property belonging to another or being reckless whether any such

property would be destroyed or damaged, fails to take any steps to

extinguish the fire or prevent damage to such property by that fire (see

p 981 d to f, p 982 f to j, and p 983 j to p 984 b, post). 

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.

続きを読みます adulttorrent.org

ここに adulttorrent.org

www.adulttorrent.org/search/淫妖蟲 獄~凌触地獄退魔録~/5

Ready to get started?