Macarthys v Smith

322 words (1 pages) Case Summary in Cases

07/03/18 Cases Reference this In-house law team

Jurisdiction(s): European Union

Disclaimer: This work is intended for educational use only, it does not constitute legal advice and should not be relied upon to advise clients on legal matters.

If you would like to view other samples of the academic work produced by our writers, please click here.

Macarthys Ltd v Smith [1979] (Case 129/79)

Established that domestic law ought be interpreted in light of EC law, with EC law prevailing in the event of conflict.


The claimant, Ms Smith, was a factory employee of the defendants, Macarthys, for which she received a salary of £50 per week. She complained that the man who had previously held the same job in the company had received £60 per week, and thus that the defendants were in breach of both the British Equal Pay Act 1970, as well as Article 119 of the EC Treaty. The defendants contended that the domestic statute was inapplicable as it did not provide for comparisons of salary with former employees to which Ms Smith responded that this did not negate the applicability of EC law in which comparisons were permitted. Further, Ms Smith submitted that where UK and EC legislation was incompatible on the matter, EC law would prevail.


Whether UK or EC law ought have supremacy in the event of conflict.


The Court of Appeal found against Ms Smith, on the grounds that EC treaties were not a factor in the interpretation of domestic law. Notably Lord Denning dissented, on the grounds that the Court ought presume that Parliament ‘intends to fulfil its obligations under the Treaty’ and had not given any indication that it thought earlier British law ought prevail over EC laws on the matter.

The case was then referred to the European Court of Justice where it was held that Ms Smith was entitled to compare her salary with that of a former employee, giving approval to the statement provided by Lord Denning in dissent. Subsequently, the Court of Appeal then found for Ms Smith as per the European court’s order.

Words: 294

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please: