Fletcher v Autocar and Transporters

314 words (1 pages) Case Summary in Cases

07/03/18 Cases Reference this

Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of Parallelewelten.net.

If you would like to view samples of the work produced by our academic writers please click here.

Fletcher v Autocar and Transporters [1968] 2 QB 322



The claimant, a chartered quantity surveyor, was driving along when a lorry driven by the defendants' employee negligently ran into his car. The claimant suffered severe injuries, including extensive brain damage, as a result of which he was entirely dependent on his wife to care for him. Three years after the accident, his wife was no longer able to assist him and he spent the remainder of his life (which was not expected to be shortened by his injuries) in a mental hospital as a paying patient.

At first instance, the judge assessed damages under four heads (special damages, loss of future earnings, additional expenses, and damages for pain, suffering and loss of amenity). He then calculated the total sum to be awarded by adding together the figure for each head, without further consideration of whether this final amount was just and reasonable. The defendant appealed the quantum of damages.


The key question was whether the total figure should be revised if the assessment of individual heads of damage amounted to an ‘exceptionally high’ or ‘daunting’ figure when taken together.


The Court of Appeal held that assessment of damages as individual heads of compensation was merely an aid to determine a sum which was fair and reasonable. It was also necessary for the judge to ensure that the final sum awarded was fair and reasonable, particularly by considering the inter-relationship of the heads of assessment in a case such as this where the plaintiff’s life has been transformed and there is a considerable danger of overlapping between the heads of damage. The appeal was therefore allowed.

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.

Current Offers