Douglas v Hello Ltd

319 words (1 pages) Case Summary in Cases

07/03/18 Cases Reference this

Last modified: 07/03/18 Author: In-house law team

Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.

If you would like to view other samples of the academic work produced by our writers, please click here.

Douglas v Hello! Ltd (No. 3) [2005] EWCA Civ 595

Tort – Economic loss – Unlawful interference – Breach of Confidence – damages


The Douglases were a celebrity couple who sold exclusive photography rights of their wedding to OK! Magazine. An unauthorised freelance photographer gained access to the wedding and sold pictures to Hello! Magazine, a rival competitor. The Douglases sought an interlocutory injunction restraining publication which was initially granted, but then lifted several days later. OK! Magazine brought their publication forward to compete, incurring expenses. OK! And the Douglases sued for damages.


Whether OK! Magazine and the Douglases had a right to commercial confidence over the wedding photos that were published in the public domain.


The appeal was allowed on the basis that the Douglases and OK! Magazine were entitled to a commercial confidence over the wedding photos as the photos were not publicly available so were confidential, even though information about the wedding was generally available for people to communicate. There was found to be economic loss that arose from Hello! Magazine’s interference, constituting an intentional act. The photographs had a commercial value and therefore demonstrated the need for confidentiality. The Douglases were entitled to protect the confidentiality that Hello! Magazine and the unauthorised photographer were intent on destroying. Thus, even though OK! published the photographs before Hello!, this did not mean the photos were in the public domain and no longer subject to confidence. Each photograph was intended to convey the visual information of their wedding and that each picture would be treated as a separate piece of information that OK! had an exclusive right to publish. This right was deliberately interfered with. Thus, the Douglases were entitled to damages for breach of confidence and interference by Hello! Magazine.

Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.
Reference Copied to Clipboard.

Related Services

View all

DMCA / Removal Request

If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please:

купить систему автоматического полива

Current Offers