Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.
If you would like to view other samples of the academic work produced by our writers, please click here.
Cassidy v Daily Mirror Newspapers Ltd  2 KB 331
Libel; husband and wife; statement for per se defamatory
The claimant was known as the lawfully wedded wife of a famous race-horse owner and former General of the Mexican Army. The claimant and her husband lived separately but he often visited her at her workplace. The defendant newspaper published a photograph of the claimant’s husband with a woman labelled as Miss X, to whom – as alleged by the attached article – he was engaged.
The claimant argued that the publication caused damage to her in that it was intended to imply that her husband was living with her immorally. The defendants denied any such intention and even the possibility of their publication having such a meaning. The defendants refused to admit, even after seeing evidence thereof, that the claimant was married to the subject of the publication. The trial judge found that in the circumstances of this case, the publication could be seen as having a defamatory meaning. He directed the jury that what mattered was the perception of the reasonably minded person who knew the circumstances of the case. The jury found in favour of the claimant.
The Court of Appeal held, affirming the lower court’s decision, that the publication in question was capable of constituting defamation. It found that the jury was right to find that the publication made the reasonably minded person believe that the claimant’s moral character was questionable.
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.