Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.
If you would like to view other samples of the academic work produced by our writers, please click here.
Bennet v Bennet (1879) 10 Ch. D. 474
Equity – Presumption of Advancement – Gift – Bankruptcy – Resulting Trust – Obligation
This case concerned a transaction between a mother and her son and the presumption of advancement in equity. Mother, Ann Bennet, wanted to help her son who was in some financial difficulty. Consequently, she gave Philip Bennet £300 in the way of a loan. Unfortunately, the son still went bankrupt and could not pay his debts. The trustee in bankruptcy tried to claim what was left of his money.
The mother argued that there could not be a presumption of advancement, as she had only loaned her son the money and this sum of £300 should be returned to her. The issue in this case was whether there was a presumption of advancement between the mother and son or if the money was held on a resulting trust for the mother.
The court held that based on the evidence presented in this case there was no presumption of advancement between Ann Bennet and Philip Bennet. The money she had given his son was a loan to help him deal with his financial troubles. In addition, the courts stated that in equity, there was no presumption of advancement between mother and her child, as there was no moral obligation for a mother to provide for her child. This could only be a father or a male figure. Thus, the court upheld Ann Bennet’s claim and the £300 sum was held on a resulting trust for the mother.
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please: