Disclaimer: This work was produced by one of our professional writers as a learning aid to help you with your studies.
If you would like to view other samples of the academic work produced by our writers, please click here.
Abbey National Building Society v Cann  1 AC 56
Actual occupation will not bind a first mortgagee.
The first defendant, George Cann, applied for a mortgage from a building society to buy a house. However, unknown to the building society, his mother (the second defendant) had contributed to the purchase price. The building society advanced the mortgage loan money before the property was transferred to the defendant. Some 25 minutes before completion the defendant’s mother moved into the address. When the defendant defaulted on his mortgage, his mother claimed an overriding interest. The defendants appealed against the granting of a possession order in the building society’s favour, and the appeal reached the House of Lords.
The Land Registration Act 1925, s.70(1)(g) provides that an interest of a person in actual occupation may override registered dispositions. The mother claimed she had such an interest due to having contributed to the purchase price. Consequently, if she was also in actual occupation before the legal charge took effect she would have an overriding interest that would take priority over the mortgage. If so, she could not be evicted.
Appeal dismissed. The occupier’s interest also had to arise before the creation of the legal charge if it was to override it. Their Lordships held that when a buyer buys a property with a mortgage, the entire process is one indivisible transaction. Therefore, moving furniture in 25 minutes before the legal transfer of the property was not enough for actual occupation as this required some degree of permanence. Consequently, her interest did not override the legal mortgage.
Related ServicesView all
DMCA / Removal Request
If you are the original writer of this essay and no longer wish to have the essay published on the UK Essays website then please.